Team Rating Score Effect W- L --------------- ------ ------- ------ ----- Charleston South. 627.4 LOSS 69-96 19-12 Division I Anderson (SC) 595.9 LOSS 54-57 26- 6 Division II Anderson (SC) 595.9 LOSS 48-63 26- 6 Division II Lincoln Memorial 591.1 LOSS 66-71 26- 6 Division II Lander 580.5 LOSS 58-63 18- 9 Division II King College (TN) 576.7 LOSS 79-80 23- 8 Division II King College (TN) 576.7 LOSS 50-56 23- 8 Division II Mount Olive 575.6 LOSS 72-83 21- 8 Division II Barton 560.2 LOSS 70-80 20-10 Division II Queens (NC) 559.4 LOSS 61-65 19-10 Division II Belmont Abbey 531.6 LOSS 59-79 15-12 Division II Coker 523.9 LOSS 47-73 14-13 Division II Carson-Newman 519.9 LOSS 70-73 15-14 Division II Limestone 510.2 LOSS 58-74 12-16 Division II Lee-McRae 502.1 LOSS 68-82 9-17 Division II North Greenville 501.6 LOSS 78-82 11-15 Division II North Greenville 501.6 LOSS 73-80 11-15 Division II Paine College 478.4 LOSS 65-81 15-14 Division II >> Erskine 487.4 << 10-18 Division II Belmont Abbey 531.6 WIN 84-74 ++ 15-12 Division II Limestone 510.2 WIN 61-58 ++ 12-16 Division II Pfeiffer 504.4 WIN 79-74 ++ 12-14 Division II Lee-McRae 502.1 WIN 69-61 ++ 9-17 Division II Point 489.7 WIN 100-79 ++ 1- 6 (null) St. Andrews 460.3 WIN 95-85 + 7-21 Division II Johnson&Wales 412.1 WIN 84-65 + 13-28 Division III Southern Wesleyan 411.4 WIN 73-61 + 0- 7 NAIA I Allen 377.6 WIN 87-59 0-12 NAIA I Allen 377.6 WIN 83-65 0-12 NAIA I
"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.
Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).