Franklin&Marshall (19-2)

Franklin&Marshall's opponents in order of rating: 
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Muhlenberg         471.2 LOSS   58-60         14- 7 Division III
   Washington (MD)    468.3 LOSS   74-78         13- 8 Division III
>> Franklin&Marshall  530.7 <<                   19- 2 Division III
   St. Mary's, MD     509.4 WIN    77-68    +    16- 6 Division III
   Hobart             503.6 WIN    81-71    +    16- 4 Division III
   Misericordia       493.3 WIN    68-55    +    15- 6 Division III
   Muhlenberg         471.2 WIN    87-55    +    14- 7 Division III
   Washington (MD)    468.3 WIN    63-47    +    13- 8 Division III
   Dickinson          459.0 WIN    65-62    +    12- 9 Division III
   Johns Hopkins      450.5 WIN    65-40    +    12- 9 Division III
   Haverford          431.6 WIN    71-61          8-13 Division III
   Haverford          431.6 WIN    77-57          8-13 Division III
   Gettysburg         429.7 WIN    61-47          9-12 Division III
   Neumann            425.3 WIN    69-63         11-11 Division III
   Ursinus            421.0 WIN    70-52          8-13 Division III
   Ursinus            421.0 WIN    63-54          8-13 Division III
   McDaniel           400.4 WIN    63-46    -     7-14 Division III
   McDaniel           400.4 WIN    70-46    -     7-14 Division III
   Lancaster Bible    357.5 WIN    57-40    -     6-13 NSCAA & NCCAA
   SUNY-Oneonta       356.9 WIN    64-46    -     2-19 Division III
   SUNY-Oneonta       356.9 WIN    65-46    -     2-19 Division III
   Swarthmore         334.3 WIN    74-50    -     1-20 Division III
Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).