Georgetown (18-4)


Georgetown's opponents in order of rating:
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Kansas             778.0 LOSS   63-67         18- 5 Division I
   West Virginia      734.4 LOSS   62-74         16- 8 Division I
   Cincinnati         711.5 LOSS   64-68         16- 7 Division I
   Pittsburgh         711.1 LOSS   60-72         15- 9 Division I
>> Georgetown         762.0 <<                   18- 4 Division I
   Marquette          756.6 WIN    73-70    +    20- 5 Division I
   Louisville         754.6 WIN    71-68    +    19- 5 Division I
   Alabama            736.9 WIN    57-55    +    16- 7 Division I
   Memphis            734.2 WIN    91-88    +    16- 7 Division I
   Memphis            734.2 WIN    70-59    +    16- 7 Division I
   Connecticut        724.2 WIN    58-44    +    15- 8 Division I
   South Florida      694.0 WIN    75-45    +    13-10 Division I
   Providence         673.1 WIN    49-40    +    13-12 Division I
   St. John's (NY)    672.6 WIN    69-49    +    10-13 Division I
   Rutgers            672.3 WIN    52-50    +    12-12 Division I
   DePaul             664.4 WIN    83-75         11-12 Division I
   American           636.5 WIN    81-55    -    15- 8 Division I
   Savannah St.       617.7 WIN    83-54    -    14-10 Division I
   IUPUI              611.3 WIN    81-58    -    10-15 Division I
   UNC Greensboro     604.2 WIN    86-45    -     9-15 Division I
   Chaminade          583.3 WIN    88-61    -     9- 7 Division II
   NJ Inst Tech       570.8 WIN    84-44    -    10-12 Division I
   Howard U.          558.5 WIN    62-48   --     6-18 Division I

Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).