Knox (2-20)

Knox's opponents in order of rating: 
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Lake Forest        539.8 LOSS   54-57         20- 4 Division III
   Lake Forest        539.8 LOSS   50-64         20- 4 Division III
   Augustana (IL)     525.7 LOSS   53-55         19- 7 Division III
   Grinnell           513.2 LOSS   68-85         18- 5 Division III
   Grinnell           513.2 LOSS   87-128        18- 5 Division III
   St. Norbert        496.7 LOSS   57-76         16- 8 Division III
   St. Norbert        496.7 LOSS   58-60         16- 8 Division III
   Carroll            484.9 LOSS   61-68         15-11 Division III
   Carroll            484.9 LOSS   61-84         15-11 Division III
   Ripon              480.5 LOSS   51-78         14- 9 Division III
   Ripon              480.5 LOSS   62-78         14- 9 Division III
   Defiance           478.8 LOSS   77-81         13-13 Division III
   Trine              475.8 LOSS   85-94         15-11 Division III
   Beloit             454.9 LOSS   59-69         10-13 Division III
   Beloit             454.9 LOSS   76-86         10-13 Division III
   Lawrence           453.9 LOSS   83-92          9-12 Division III
   Ill. Benedictine   431.8 LOSS   63-69         13-15 Division III
   Monmouth (IL)      427.8 LOSS   75-78          7-16 Division III
   Illinois Col.      422.0 LOSS   56-70          6-17 Division III
   Illinois Col.      422.0 LOSS   79-91          6-17 Division III
>> Knox               379.0 <<                    2-20 Division III
   Monmouth (IL)      427.8 WIN    76-66   ++     7-16 Division III
   Milwaukee Engin    404.4 WIN    63-58   ++    10-15 Division III
Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).