Purdue (15-7)


Purdue's opponents in order of rating:
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Michigan St.       775.0 LOSS   58-83         17- 4 Division I
   Wisconsin          763.6 LOSS   62-67         17- 5 Division I
   Michigan           759.9 LOSS   64-66         16- 5 Division I
   Alabama            732.1 LOSS   56-65         14- 7 Division I
   Xavier             715.8 LOSS   63-66         14- 7 Division I
   Penn State         679.7 LOSS   45-65         10-12 Division I
   Butler             666.1 LOSS   65-67         12-11 Division I
>> Purdue             729.3 <<                   15- 7 Division I
   Illinois           746.2 WIN    75-60   ++    15- 6 Division I
   Minnesota          738.4 WIN    79-66   ++    16- 6 Division I
   Temple             734.9 WIN    85-77   ++    15- 5 Division I
   Northwestern       723.3 WIN    58-56    +    12- 8 Division I
   Miami (FL)         704.7 WIN    76-65    +    11- 7 Division I
   Iona               700.3 WIN    91-90    +    16- 5 Division I
   Iowa               691.1 WIN    79-76    +    11-10 Division I
   Iowa               691.1 WIN    75-68    +    11-10 Division I
   W. Michigan        657.8 WIN    80-37    +    10-11 Division I
   IUPU Ft. Wayne     627.3 WIN    81-56         10-11 Division I
   E. Michigan        625.8 WIN    61-36         10-11 Division I
   W. Carolina        607.3 WIN    65-60    -     9-13 Division I
   Coppin State       599.3 WIN    78-57    -    10-11 Division I
   High Point         577.2 WIN    67-65    -     8-14 Division I
   N. Illinois        525.5 WIN    96-34   --     2-17 Division I

Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).