Southern NewHamp (11-11)

Southern NewHamp's opponents in order of rating: 
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Adelphi            586.9 LOSS   50-57         16- 5 Division II
   Mass.-Lowell       585.3 LOSS   56-67         16- 5 Division II
   Franklin Pierce    581.7 LOSS   67-72         16- 5 Division II
   Bentley            577.9 LOSS   76-92         15- 6 Division II
   Stonehill          567.6 LOSS   58-70         14- 7 Division II
   St. Anselm         535.3 LOSS   63-77         10-11 Division II
   Assumption         519.9 LOSS   67-80          9-12 Division II
   St. Michael's      504.1 LOSS   57-59          7-14 Division II
   American Intl.     493.9 LOSS   66-78          6-15 Division II
   New York Tech      480.6 LOSS   60-74          8-11 Division II
   St. Rose           475.6 LOSS   66-73          4-17 Division II
>> Southern NewHamp   527.5 <<                   11-11 Division II
   Mass.-Lowell       585.3 WIN    80-68   ++    16- 5 Division II
   LIU-C. W. Post     559.0 WIN    84-80   ++    15- 5 Division II
   New Haven          550.2 WIN    65-59   ++    13- 8 Division II
   Merrimack          546.2 WIN    70-63   ++    11-10 Division II
   St. Anselm         535.3 WIN    81-65   ++    10-11 Division II
   LeMoyne            531.1 WIN    81-73   ++    11-10 Division II
   Pace               530.4 WIN    72-69   ++    11-10 Division II
   S. Connecticut     527.3 WIN    69-67    +    10-11 Division II
   Molloy             458.4 WIN    83-71    +     7-14 Division II
   Queens (NY)        445.9 WIN    74-60    +     4-17 Division II
   Mercy              426.5 WIN    72-41          3-18 Division II
Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).