Thomas More (15-7)


Thomas More's opponents in order of rating:
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Transylvania       553.7 LOSS   80-85         19- 2 Division III
   Williams           516.8 LOSS   64-66         16- 6 Division III
   Bethany,W.Va.      491.1 LOSS   74-89         18- 7 Division III
   Wilmington (OH)    484.2 LOSS   83-96         11- 9 Division III
   Thiel              473.5 LOSS   64-66         14- 7 Division III
   St. Vincent (PA)   463.6 LOSS   71-86         15- 4 NAIA II
   Spalding           441.9 LOSS   73-83         11-11 Division III
>> Thomas More        462.5 <<                   15- 7 Division III
   Bethany,W.Va.      491.1 WIN    68-57   ++    18- 7 Division III
   Thiel              473.5 WIN    73-63   ++    14- 7 Division III
   Mount St. Joseph   427.6 WIN    52-44    +     7-15 Division III
   Heidelberg         415.5 WIN    84-63    +     6-15 Division III
   Grove City         412.1 WIN    68-55    +     9-11 Division III
   Grove City         412.1 WIN    73-65    +     9-11 Division III
   Wash. & Jeff.      376.6 WIN    67-66    +     5-15 Division III
   Wash. & Jeff.      376.6 WIN    84-74    +     5-15 Division III
   Cinc.-Clermont     375.6 WIN    78-70    +     0- 6 NSCAA & NCCAA
   Westminster (PA)   371.9 WIN    79-68          5-17 Division III
   Earlham            370.3 WIN    90-78          1-20 Division III
   Kent-Tuscar.       362.5 WIN   110-51          0- 1 (null)
   Geneva             351.4 WIN    75-63    -     4-14 NAIA II
   Geneva             351.4 WIN    91-77    -     4-14 NAIA II
   Waynesburg         349.3 WIN    70-62    -     4-17 Division III

Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).