Wofford (14-8)

Wofford's opponents in order of rating: 
     Team            Rating        Score  Effect  W- L
   ---------------   ------       ------- ------ -----
   Wisconsin          763.6 LOSS   33-69         17- 5 Division I
   Davidson           697.3 LOSS   69-72         15- 5 Division I
   Georgia            684.4 LOSS   49-62         10-10 Division I
   South Carolina     657.9 LOSS   45-57          9-11 Division I
   Missouri KC        611.4 LOSS   58-64          9-15 Division I
   W. Carolina        607.3 LOSS   57-67          9-13 Division I
   Tn.-Chattanooga    586.8 LOSS   48-51          9-14 Division I
   High Point         577.2 LOSS   79-87          8-14 Division I
>> Wofford            644.1 <<                   14- 8 Division I
   Wake Forest        669.4 WIN    56-52   ++    11-10 Division I
   Col. Charleston    659.3 WIN    75-58   ++    12- 9 Division I
   Col. Charleston    659.3 WIN    68-59   ++    12- 9 Division I
   Tulane             651.5 WIN    61-50   ++    14- 7 Division I
   Bradley            627.2 WIN    70-66    +     6-17 Division I
   Furman             615.2 WIN    79-72    +    11-10 Division I
   Appalachian St.    614.4 WIN    73-61    +     9-11 Division I
   Georgia Southern   604.5 WIN    88-63    +     9-12 Division I
   Jacksonville FL    569.8 WIN    63-57    +     4-17 Division I
   Prairie View       566.1 WIN    56-49    +     9-12 Division I
   Citadel            543.5 WIN    82-63          4-17 Division I
   Citadel            543.5 WIN    62-55          4-17 Division I
   Virginia-Wise      458.3 WIN    69-66    -     0- 6 NAIA II
   Emory & Henry      420.1 WIN    70-55   --     6-12 Division III
Games against teams within about 100 rating points are often the best indicators of a team's actual strength.

"Effect" ranges from "---", a game that caused a large decrease in the team rating, to "+++", a game that produced a large increase in rating.

Note that wins over very weak teams may actually hurt a team's rating (the opposite is true for losses to very good teams).